<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Launches New Privacy Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/</link>
	<description>As privacy expert Ray Everett-Church travels the corridors of power and privilege, he runs across plenty of strange crap (a lot of it related to privacy, but not always). This blog is where he tries to make some sense of it all.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:14:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PrivacyClue&#8211;Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics &#38; Culture &#187; Google&#8217;s Temper Tantrum</title>
		<link>http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivacyClue&#8211;Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics &#38; Culture &#187; Google&#8217;s Temper Tantrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 09:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] company&#8217;s ethics[.]&#8221; For what it&#8217;s worth, I too have previously analyzed some of the gaping holes in Google&#8217;s privacy policies, and how one of Google&amp;#821 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company&#8217;s ethics[.]&#8221; For what it&#8217;s worth, I too have previously analyzed some of the gaping holes in Google&#8217;s privacy policies, and how one of Google&amp;#821 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrivacyClue&#8211;Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics &#38; Culture &#187; CNet Summarizes Google&#8217;s Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivacyClue&#8211;Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics &#38; Culture &#187; CNet Summarizes Google&#8217;s Issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] 217; (In which I discuss the difference between &#8220;do no evil&#8221; and Doing Good.) 	Google Launches New Privacy Controversy (In which I analyze gaping holes in Google&amp;#821 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 217; (In which I discuss the difference between &#8220;do no evil&#8221; and Doing Good.) 	Google Launches New Privacy Controversy (In which I analyze gaping holes in Google&amp;#821 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrivacyClue - Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics and Culture &#187; Google Forgets About Privacy (Again!)</title>
		<link>http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivacyClue - Ray Everett-Church on Privacy, Politics and Culture &#187; Google Forgets About Privacy (Again!)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] nline contains no provisions for protecting the privacy of people who use the service. 	As I have previously noted, Google&#8217;s pr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nline contains no provisions for protecting the privacy of people who use the service. 	As I have previously noted, Google&#8217;s pr [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2005 02:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privacyclue.com/index.php/20050421/google-launches-new-privacy-controversy/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I can see a big datamining upside for Google. What is really in it for me?  If I like what I searched for, I bookmark the query or bookmark the specific results. What makes this more useful?

If they want to pay me to track my searches, then maybe we can talk. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see a big datamining upside for Google. What is really in it for me?  If I like what I searched for, I bookmark the query or bookmark the specific results. What makes this more useful?</p>
<p>If they want to pay me to track my searches, then maybe we can talk. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
